Site Loader

How can a traumatic experience influence children’s behavior?

The issues environing children’s behavior after a traumatic experience are complex, multifactorial and frequently enormously controversial. Having considered the literature on the topic, one could be forgiven for believing that there are as many sentiments on the issues as there are people sing the issues.

In this reappraisal we have attempted to cover as many of the major countries as possible in order to show a moderately comprehensive overview of the topic.

The definition of a traumatic experience is subjective from both the point of position of the kid concerned and besides organize the perceiver. Some observers have suggested that the lone feasible definition of a traumatic experience is one that, by definition, produces incontrovertible psychological sequelae. ( Abikoff 1987 ) This may be the instance, but as other observers observe, some psychological sequelae may non come up for old ages, if at all. This does non intend that the original triggering episode was non traumatic. There is besides the position that that the worst sort, or most utmost type of injury may be the most likely to be actively suppressed at either a witting or subconscious degree. ( Haddad & A ; Garralda. 1992 )

Literature Review

With an country of literature as huge as the 1 that we are sing here, it is frequently hard to happen a topographic point to get down. In this case we will see the paper by Prof. Harry Zetlin ( 1995 ) who starts with a short monograph on the showing of a telecasting programme which dealt with arguably the most ruinous of emphasiss to bechance a kid, that of the loss of a parent through slaying or force. He makes several thought arousing remarks which are worthy of consideration as they are originative to the push of this article. The first is a supplication that the diagnostic label of post-traumatic emphasis should non be a catch-all basket for all emotional and behavioral jobs that can happen after a traumatic experience. ( Gorcey et al.1986 )

The 2nd is the realization that in the peculiar fortunes portrayed on the telecasting where a parent is murdered have two effects. The first is the obvious ruinous injury that the kid experiences with the violent loss of a parent, but the 2nd is the much less obvious fact that the kid has, at a shot, besides lost a valuable, and usually available resource, of the protective household environment, which is frequently one of the most utile curative tools available to the healer. He adds to this two farther penetrations. The first is that the lasting parent has their ain injury to cover with and that is constantly transmitted to the kid and that, because such events are mercifully relatively rare, merely a relatively few professionals are of all time able to construct up any important expertness and experience on the topic.

The chief issue of the piece is, nevertheless, the really relevant point that sing the evident compulsion of the media with intrusive fly-on-the-wall docudramas and the about every bit insatiate public hungriness for esthesis, the really fact that such a programme is made at all, about necessarily adds to the injury felt by the victims. ( Koss et al 1989 ) One could reason that really facing and speaking about such issues is portion of the healing procedure. Such considerations may be of value in the grownup who is more able to rationalize the constructs involved, but to the kid this may be really much more hard and being forced to live over the episodes in a really public and unfamiliar spheres, may make little more than add to the psychological emphasiss and harm already caused. ( Mayall & A ; Gold 1995 )

This paper offers a wise and considered supplication for sense and moderateness, non to advert reserve and decency. It is written in composure and considered moderate tones which makes the impact of its message all the more powerful. The following few documents that we would wish to analyze trade with the thorny issue of Attention shortage hyperactivity upset ( ADHD ) in kids. It has to be commented that there is a considerable organic structure of literature which argues on both sides of the argument about whether ADHD is the consequence of childhood injury. One side is presented, rather forcibly, by Bramble ( et Al. 1998 ) . The writers cite Kewley ( 1998 ) as saying that the premier aetiology of ADHD is a familial neuro-developmental 1. They challenge the uttered positions that it is a manifestation of early childhood maltreatment or injury which can hold occurred at some clip antecedently with the words:

..early maltreatment and injury subsequently manifest as symptoms and that the sensing of these symptoms in kids clearly illustrates early injury is a premier illustration of the logical false belief that underpins all psychoanalytical theory and pattern.

The writers argue that to province because psychotherapeutics is frequently effectual it must reflect the fact that a traumatic episode must hold been responsible because it addresses straight the original emotional injury ( Follette et al.1996 ) , is wholly unsound. The natural patterned advance of this statement, they assert, is the ground why many parents of kids with ADHD have such trouble in happening child head-shrinkers who can really assist them instead than the many who would seek to fault them for the kid ‘s behavior in the first topographic point. ( Breire 1992 )

The writers take the position that the ground that psychoanalytical practicians have held so much influence on the profession over the old ages is that it is merely late that the blaze of grounds based medical specialty has fallen on their subject. The writers argue that far from utilizing psychotherapeutic tools to seek to accomplish declaration, the grounds suggests that psycho-stimulant intervention is far more effectual ( Abikoff 1987 ) if merely because it enhances the curative consequence of other signifiers of intervention such as household therapy and particular educational proviso.

The converse statement, or possibly an extension of the statement, is presented by Thambirajah ( 1998 ) who takes the position that many documents on ADHD ( and by illation he is mentioning to the 1 reviewed above ) , regard the syndrome as being a diagnosing made merely by look intoing an appropriate figure of boxes on a check-list. He asserts that factors such as biopsychological fortunes should be weighed every bit strongly as the symptom bunch of impulsivity, inattention or hyperactivity. ( Tannock 1998 )

In direct contrast to the predating paper he states that early traumatic experiences, current maltreatment or even depression of the female parent may all be conducive factors in the aetiology of the status. He argues that taking no history of these factors is to disregard much of the accrued grounds and wisdom on the topic. He besides makes a really valid point that to disregard these factors and merely to utilize the check-list attack means that here is an over-reliance on the significance of these symptoms and, as a direct consequence, this leads to an overestimate of prevalence. He points to the evidently erroneous estimation of a survey that was based entirely on cheque list symptomatology, of 15 % ( although the survey is non quoted ) .

The writer makes the really valid point that most head-shrinkers would hold that the hyperkinetic upset is a little sub-group within the ADHD syndrome and that these kids may necessitate intervention with stimulations but merely after other aetiologies have been excluded. He makes the instead disposed comparing of handling all kids with ADHD the same manner as naming all four legged animate beings with a tail donkeys. There are a great many more documents on this issue which we could usefully reexamine but we must research other countries of injury in a kid ‘s life in order to seek to give a representative overview.

With the possible exclusion of the state of affairs outlined in the first paper reviewed, there can be few experiences more traumatizing to a kid than to me do homeless as a refugee in a clip of war. The paper by Hodes ( et Al. 2001 ) is both bosom rending and enlightening as it explores the wellness demands of refugees geting in the UK. Although the paper catalogues all of the wellness demands ( that demand non concern us in this article ) of the refugees, it does non overlook the psychosocial injury facets of the kids ‘s predicament. They point to the fact that one manner that a kid ‘s psychological injury can be minimised is by being accepted into a equal group such as a school. While this may so be true, the job is that refugee kids are rarely seen by their equals as belonging and are hence rarely wholly accepted. ( Lewis 1998 )

This is either aggravated or caused by the fact that they already have twice the rate of psychiatric upset as found in control groups of kids. ( Tousignant et Al. 1999 ) . It is hence of import to be cognizant of these jobs as they are frequently really conformable to psychiatric intercession ( O’Shea et al. 2000 ) . The writers quote a paper by Burnett and Peel ( 2001 ) who appear to be peculiarly pessimistic about doing a diagnosing of post-traumatic emphasis upset in kids from a basically different civilization, as their recovery is thought to be secondary to the Reconstruction of their support webs, which may turn out peculiarly hard in a different or even foreign, cultural environment. They point to surveies of the kids who fled to the USA to get away the Pol Pot government, who had post-traumatic emphasis in childhood, and even when followed up 12 old ages subsequently they quote 35 % as still holding post traumatic emphasis and 14 % had active depression. ( Sack et al. 1999 ) .

This may be a contemplation of the trouble in acquiring appropriate intervention for a status in a different civilization. But, in distinguishable relevancy to our considerations here, the writers comment that even exposure to a individual stressor may ensue in a surprisingly relentless station traumatic emphasis reaction. ( Richards & A ; Lovell 1999 ) . The last article that we are traveling to see here is a paper by Papineni ( 2003 ) . This paper has been selected partially because of it ‘s direct relevancy to our consideration, but besides because on a human degree, it is a concentrating piece of composing. It is entitled Children of bad memories and opens with the quotation mark Every clip there is a war there is a colza ( Stiglmayer 1994 ) .

The whole article is a aggregation of war-related colza narratives and the attendant abnormal psychology that ensued. The writer specifically explores the issues associating to childhood colza and its wake. She besides considers a related issue and that is how the consequence of maternal shame shapes a kid ‘s perceptual experience of themselves ( with heartrending effects ) , how the shame felt by the female parent is frequently externalised to impact the kid who is the seeable symbol of the physical act. ( Carpenter 2000 )

The catalogue of emotion and reaction described in this article by some of the topics, would about do an important text book on the effects of a traumatic experience in childhood. It would be about impossible to quantify a individual negative emotion that was neither articulated nor experienced by the victims, non merely of the act of colza, but besides of the stigma and wake of the act which was frequently described as the worst facet of the whole thing.

A changeless subject that runs trough the paper is the realization that the presence of a kid conceived by a colza is a powerful reminder of the injury and therefore is, in itself a saloon to psychological healing. The writer besides points to the fact that another, about inevitable effect of physical colza, is trouble with relationships and familiarity which can lay waste to a kid ‘s societal development. ( Human Rights Watch.1996 ) .

Such a kid may non merely hold this load to bear for its life, but the stigma forced upon it by society may besides hold untold effects. The writer quotes a kid born from the Rwandan struggle, depicting itself by different names which bear informant to society ‘s perceptual experience, and more accurately and necessarily, the kid ‘s perceptual experience of itself:kids of hatred, enfants non-desirA©s ( unwanted kids ) , or enfants mauvais keepsake ( kids of bad memories )

The writer describes how such psychological injury may ne’er be successfully treated and ends with the really perceptive remark. There can non be peace without justness, and unless the international community recognises all colza in struggle state of affairss as offenses against humanity, there will be no peace for the victims of such atrociousnesss.


It is clearly a forlorn hope to cover all of the facets of injury and its possible impact on a kid ‘s life in one short article. We hope that, by being selective, we have been able to supply the reader with an important penetration into some on the jobs associated with the topic.

Post Author: admin