Site Loader

In today’s society. we as work forces and adult females are burdened with a dual criterion of how one’s sex life is supposed to travel. We hear from our friends and household. from churches and neighbours. that sex is something you do with the individual you love and trust. person who you are traveling to portion the remainder of your life with. Sexual activity comes with matrimony. and with matrimony comes a promise that you will stay with this one individual “’til decease do us portion. ”

But this is no longer the instance. as people all over the universe are holding sex manner before matrimony. We develop attractive forces to the people we see in school or in the workplace. and we day of the month each other. and in other instances. we “hook up. ” This is where sex comes in. It seems as though we may hold lost that significance of sex and familiarity and promise. and now we have developed a game. A race even- who can hold sex with more people? Who is the most experient? Who is the best? And as we all want to seek and win this race. recoil is inevitable. As work forces increase in Numberss. they increase in “manliness” and power among each other. As adult females increase in Numberss. they decrease to “sluts and “whores” or to “easy” persons. Where in the universe did this semen from?

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Of class. the power of adult male did non arise in the twenty-first Century. Man has been the figure one sex every bit early as the 1600s. when scientists. physicians and faith claimed that the organic structures of work forces and adult females were one. A organic structure in this clip period was “fluid. ” and of all time altering. and work forces and adult females were represented in a hierarchy. A male organic structure was a perfect organic structure to compare all others to ; it was strong. full of heat and truth.

A female organic structure was one that lacked critical heat and flawlessness. doing these organic structures the opposite of a male organic structure. Women retained. indoors. the generative constructions that are seeable on the male organic structure. Womans were weaker. softer and colder and ever looked down upon. They were besides considered more out of control and their ethical motives could non be trusted. A less perfect organic structure meant a less perfect character. citizen and being.

But when the nineteenth Century was upon us. the thought of one organic structure changed into two organic structures. However. with this alteration. the thought of adult females as a lesser sex was still in gesture as scientists tried to calculate out the intent of adult females. along with the function they should play in society. Physical and “natural” differences in the organic structures of work forces and adult females justified the functions that work forces and adult females should play. This finally led to the position of separate domains. of work forces as superior and “normal” and adult females as purely here to reproduce and supply nutriment to their kids and households.

With these separate functions of work forces and adult females in society came gender functions. of work forces being “manly” and supplying for the household. remaining strong and stand foring his household in a positive mode. while adult females held down the garrison at place. cookery for her hubby after a long twenty-four hours at work and caring for the kids she brought into this universe. raising them to be respectable people merely as she and her hubby were. Womans were to be feminine and delicacy and beautiful. polite and have self-denial. Men and adult females were to be antonyms of each other. particularly in the high category. white universe.

With these images. the function of sex in each of the lives of work forces and adult females became really different. For work forces to desire desire and sex. they did as they please. since they were in charge and held the power. Work force did non necessitate to restrict holding sex to merely the adult female they were married excessively. But for adult females to believe this manner was considered out of control and even named Nymphomania at the clip. Womans resorted to ways of rebellion and sexual pleasance on their ain such as lone sex and relationships with other adult females. And as adult females pursued their sexual desires and demands. they began to prosecute their demands in other ways excessively.

Womans have led a long battle in society in the workplace and the political universe. invariably contending for a piece of the power that work forces hold so near to them. The 1900s were a bend around for adult females in society as they earned the right to vote. the right to work outside of the place. to populate entirely. single without kids. Womans were contending to be equal with work forces. to be looked at in the same manner and to be treated with merely as much regard.

Today. we have come a long manner in this procedure as a society ; we see adult females in power in political relations. non merely in The United States. but in other states as good. where adult females are Presidents and Prime Ministers. So where and when did this dual criterion of sex come to be in our universe? Why are adult females still looked down upon in the topic of sexual dealingss? To acquire some replies. I created a study. and asked some people of my coevals what they thought about this dual criterion. and if they even think it is still around today. Through Facebook. an ever-climbing societal web. I posted a study for anyone to take. inquiring 10 inquiries. Here is the lineation of my study:

Sexuality Survey

This is a study to develop an thought of the sexual intensions between work forces and adult females and the figure of sex spouses they have had every bit good as how both sexes feel about it in today’s society. The study asks a sum of 8 inquiries and each inquiry should be answered every bit candidly as possible. This study is wholly anon. and voluntary. You do non hold to reply any inquiries you do non experience comfy replying. Your input is greatly appreciated in the category of Sociology 345: Sociology of Sexuality.

Please Circle:

I am a: MaleFemale

My age is: vitamin D

Please compose a short response based on your personal feelings. experiences. and sentiments. You do non hold to reply anything you do non experience comfy replying. Your input is greatly apprehended!

Sexuality Survey

Created by Taylor Tarpey

This is a study to develop an thought of the sexual intensions between work forces and adult females and the figure of sex spouses they have had every bit good as how both sexes feel about it in today’s society. The study asks a sum of 8 inquiries and each inquiry should be answered every bit candidly as possible. This study is wholly anon. and voluntary. You do non hold to reply any inquiries you do non experience comfy replying. Your input is greatly appreciated in the category of Sociology 345: Sociology of Sexuality.

Please Circle:

I am a: MaleFemale

My age is: vitamin D

Please compose a short response based on your personal feelings. experiences. and sentiments. You do non hold to reply anything you do non experience comfy replying. Your input is greatly apprehended!

1. Have you of all time altered the figure of sex spouses you have had to avoid being judged? Why or why non? 2. How does it do you experience to hear that work forces in society today are perceived as “better” or “manly” or “pimps” if they have a high figure of sex spouses. and that adult females are perceived as “sluts” or “whores” or “easy” if they have a high figure of sex spouses? 3. How do you protect yourself from these intensions?

4. In your sentiment. what does the figure of sex spouses a adult male or a adult female has mean to you? To society? 5. In your sentiment. do you believe a man/woman who has had more sex spouses than you is considered more experient? Why or why non? 6. In your sentiment. do you believe a man/woman who has had more sex spouses than you is considered less pure? Why or why non?

7. Have you of all time been with a man/woman sexually and considered how this might alter their societal position? How it might alter yours? Why or why non? 8. In your sentiment. do you believe the sentiments of others about this sexual intension that comes with work forces and adult females holding a certain sum of sex spouses. is altering in today’s society? Why or why non?

1. In your sentiment. do you believe a man/woman who has had more sex spouses than you is considered less pure? Why or why non?

2. Have you of all time been with a man/woman sexually and considered how this might alter their societal position? How it might alter yours? Why or why non?

3. In your sentiment. do you believe the sentiments of others about this sexual intension that comes with work forces and adult females holding a certain sum of sex spouses. is altering in today’s society? Why or why non? 4.

9. Have you of all time altered the figure of sex spouses you have had to avoid being judged? Why or why non? 10. How does it do you experience to hear that work forces in society today are perceived as “better” or “manly” or “pimps” if they have a high figure of sex spouses. and that adult females are perceived as “sluts” or “whores” or “easy” if they have a high figure of sex spouses? 11. How do you protect yourself from these intensions? 12. In your sentiment. what does the figure of sex spouses a adult male or a adult female has mean to you? To society?

13. In your sentiment. do you believe a man/woman who has had more sex spouses than you is considered more experient? Why or why non? 14. In your sentiment. do you believe a man/woman who has had more sex spouses than you is considered less pure? Why or why non? 15. Have you of all time been with a man/woman sexually and considered how this might alter their societal position? How it might alter yours? Why or why non? 16. In your sentiment. do you believe the sentiments of others about this sexual intension that comes with work forces and adult females holding a certain sum of sex spouses. is altering in today’s society? Why or why non?

5. In your sentiment. do you believe a man/woman who has had more sex spouses than you is considered less pure? Why or why non?

6. Have you of all time been with a man/woman sexually and considered how this might alter their societal position? How it might alter yours? Why or why non?

7. In your sentiment. do you believe the sentiments of others about this sexual intension that comes with work forces and adult females holding a certain sum of sex spouses. is altering in today’s society? Why or why non? 8.

I developed these inquiries to seek and reply many inquiries of my ain. I am really funny to see what people have to state about this dual criterion and these intensions created by society. and I want to cognize where this judgement of holding excessively many sexual spouses comes from and how both work forces and adult females trade with it. I besides want to cognize if people think this dual criterion has changed as we have advanced socially in our universe. and if people truly question the society they live in.

To get down. I received 29 entire participants. with 27 who to the full finished the study. Since the study was optional. I will utilize all of the information I have received. 20 of my responses were from females. although two of them merely answered the first two inquiries. their age and sex. and 9 responses were male. More than half of these responses were 18-19 old ages old. five were 21 old ages old. and I had one of each of the followers: a response from a 20 twelvemonth old. a 42 twelvemonth old. a 47 twelvemonth old. and a 53 twelvemonth old. I was surprised to see consequences from people good out of my coevals. but grateful for these as they provided really different penetration into this subject.

In the first inquiry. 22 participants answered no. they have non changed the figure of sexual spouses they have had for assorted grounds such as being content or non ashamed with the information. or they do non care what others think or that they should non be judged or given blessing by others. I besides had some replies such as. “it is a little figure. ” “I merely tell those stopping point to me. ” and “I am non a prostitute. ” On the other manus. I received six responses stating yes. merely for the grounds of embarrassment and non desiring to be judged. One reply was difficult to put. for their response said they did non alter this figure. but it was merely one individual and they sometimes deny it.

These replies left me with the observation that by and large people are confident with their sexual picks and experience that they do non deserved to be judged. so they do non allow it consequence them. Others are afraid of embarrassment and shame. So why do they experience this manner?

My following inquiry asked about the dual criterion of work forces and adult females. and the intensions related to it. I was interested in larning what participants thought of this negative criterion in society. I received a big assortment of responses. such as many exposing disgust and unfairness or choler and unhappiness. misjudgment and favoritism. even indifference and irritation. Many gave similar replies in stating that work forces should non be glorified or in control. or that they should be “scolded” the manner adult females are. or that there should be no criterion at all and everyone should be looked at through the same eyes.

Many participants questioned this dual criterion and the equality between work forces and adult females in society. even giving replies such as work forces and adult females have created this dual criterion themselves. and genders perceive their ain gender in ways that they deem themselves hurtful or black. and besides mentioned that society demands to be more informed.

Others said this dual criterion was outdated. and that people “know what they want. ” and that “sex is normal” and “we do our ain determinations. ” every bit good as. “we live in a Patriarchal society. ” Others. such as that last response. accepted the dual criterion. stating they were raised to believe this. or it is merely a portion of development and Darwinism. and that we should all merely halt taking such difficult discourtesy. even that this criterion will ne’er alter.

Many of these responses had me wishing that people questioned society more. Why don’t we ask ourselves and others why we feel the manner we do? If so many of us are against this dual criterion. than what is maintaining it alive? And while it is alive. how are we protecting ourselves from it?

That is the inquiry I gave following. and I received three similar types of responses. The first seemed to be a twine of advice. or things one should non make. such as do non care. make non judge. make non hook up. make non acquire involved with bad people. make non portion this information. make non be bias. make non be a slattern. The 2nd type is advice stating that we should merely portion of import information with those close to us. like household and friends. or specifically merely those we are intimate with and care approximately. people we trust. The 3rd type is that we should stand up to others. for others. and for ourselves. that we should oppugn society for these intensions. and that we should interrupt down these images society has placed on right and incorrect.

It looks as though some people are believing critically here. oppugning society and proposing we fight it. while others are making more criterions for society. such as those things we should non make. If we are so against society’s criterions in the first topographic point. why create more?

My following inquiry was more personal. inquiring what a person’s figure of sex spouses means to them. and to society. Many people said this represents how a individual feels about themselves in a general sense or the criterions they set for themselves. with things like insecurities or shyness. amorousness or promiscuousness. even being easy. all come with holding more sex spouses.

Many said the sum of sexual spouses a individual has depends on what they consider intimate. and whether or non emotion and familiarity has a “deep resonance within the person. ” or that we do non take sex earnestly like we used to in the yesteryear. Some brought up the dual criterion introduced in the beginning of the study. stating that more sex spouses for a adult male meant congratulations and a adult female was considered a prostitute. To society. participants talked about sex spouses being a degree of “coolness” or experience. how responsible we are and how good we are able to do determinations. every bit good as the fact that holding a big figure of sex spouses is frequently represented in the media on Television and in magazines. I even received some responses that a high figure of sexual spouses shows how many times a individual was under the influence.

With these responses. it is apparent that the figure of sex spouses a adult male or a adult female has means a batch. to us and to society. Merely one time did I receive the reply of “nothing. ” It seems as though sex and the figure of spouses we accumulate determines who we are and what sort of values we hold. yet sex is seems to hold lost its true significance of familiarity. intimacy and love.

My following inquiry asked if a higher figure of sex spouses held by a male or female meant they had more experience. This inquiry was a small vague. as people may specify experience otherwise. but I was interested in seeing how we interpret experience. and how it relates to arouse. Most of my responses said yes. these two factors are correlated. that more sexual spouses peers more experience. merely for the ground that they have been with many different people. sing different things.

But others argued against this. stating that “experience is non quantity. but quality. ” many gave illustrations such as holding merely few sex spouses for long periods of clip. and being able to closely acquire to cognize their spouse. to “explore the organic structure and it’s wants. demands. likes and disfavors. ” is considered more experience compared to person who has slept with many people merely one clip.

As I stated earlier. participants agreed that experience means different things to different people. and I was interested in seeing how they interpreted this inquiry. It is similar to my following inquiry. which asks if participants considered holding more sexual spouses to be less pure. Most participants said no. that a figure does non find pureness and that we ne’er know the full fortunes of another person. Some interpreted this in a spiritual manner. bespeaking that pureness was related to God.

I had some replies that God forgives anyone and does non see anyone any less if they have more spouses. every bit good as pureness is disgraced with any signifier of prenuptial sexual activities. and since many of us partake in them. they do non count. Of the responses I received that said yes. more sexual spouses means one is less pure. said pureness depends on age. and that being pure is finally leftover abstainer. or even that pureness is related to cleanliness. One said we are more prone to sexually familial infections with more spouses. and that if one is less pure. they are dirty.

I was particularly eager to read responses to this inquiry because once more. I was inquiring how participants perceived the word pure. Very few interpreted this as a signifier of cleanliness. and many related it to religion and God. But many people said no. that pureness and the figure of sexual spouses a individual has are non related.

I so asked if anyone had of all time considered how being with another in a sexual manner would alter their societal position. or that of their spouse. The bulk answered no. that they had ne’er considered this before. some for the ground that they have ne’er experienced this. or it was non considered at the clip.

Others responded by stating that societal position does non count during sex. merely love and attention for the other individual is considered. or that they were non concerned with what other people thought. Of the few who answered yes. I was given many responses related more to how one would believe of himself or herself after. non of the other individual. Two responses I received were worried about how they would be looked at because of the position of the other individual. specifically because of age and repute of their spouse. even race.

This inquiry has me oppugning society. Are we truly equal? Participants by and large said that societal position does non intend anything. yet we have socially segregated the sexual actions of work forces and adult females. making a negative societal position for adult females in the universe of sex. while work forces rise above them. We argue that this dual criterion is incorrect. yet we do non see the differences we create. scene criterions without even recognizing we are making so.

My concluding inquiry was directed at the thought of this dual criterion altering in society. and if anyone thought the sentiments of others sing to the negative intensions connected with work forces and adult females were altering. The bulk of my responses were yes. that this dual criterion is altering. but for many grounds and in different ways. The chief alteration observed in the responses given was that the mentality on adult females in society is altering. Womans are going more independent. free and unfastened. in society and the workplace. and it is now more acceptable for them to hold more sex spouses.

The power is going more equally distributed and it is non every bit much of a large trade as it used to be. Other responses were more general. stating no one cares any longer ; we are going more indulgent as a society. and specifically younger coevalss are non as concerned with their reputes as older coevalss are or one time were.

I besides received some responses saying that society is altering it’s sentiments for the worse. that this dual criterion is acquiring worse. or people are “getting pregnant excessively immature. ” Participants who said no. this dual criterion is non altering in the heads of society. said that people still speak of the figure of sex spouses. that we hear it on Television and in the media. and we discuss is with household and friends. or that the dual criterion “still stands for the most portion. ”

With these responses. it looks like people see a alteration in this dual criterion. that as a society. we seem to be traveling off from it and into equality. So why do we allow the figure of sexual spouses still specify us? Why are we still doing judgements towards persons. puting a criterion for right and incorrect in society. if we say that this dual criterion is diminishing as a whole?

We could inquire an eternal sum of inquiries and analyse the ideas and feelings of every person in the universe. and about ever acquire different replies. As a whole. I think we. as a society. demand to stand up and talk out against the issues we perceive as incorrect. and inquiry the criterions that we have set for ourselves. and society. We should oppugn why we stand for something. or why we are against or for another. because it seems to me that we disagree with the negative intensions linked with gender and sexual activities. yet we enforce them in our ain. as we create judgements and criterions for what is right and incorrect. It is true. that adult females are lifting in society to be more equal with men- we have proof of that. Work force and adult females are easy going more equal in every manner compared to what they one time were so long ago. but are we going equal in the universe of sex?

Post Author: admin

x

Hi!
I'm Antonia!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out